There’s something endearing – and enlightening – about a tale from the footballing archives that showcases not just the tactical nous of a future Premier League manager, but the raw, unfiltered risks he once took on the pitch. Arne Slot, currently leading Liverpool with composure and intelligence in the post-Klopp era, was once at the heart of a kick-off routine so bizarre, so baffling, that even now it prompts laughter on Dutch television.
In 2011, Slot was a 32-year-old midfield playmaker at PEC Zwolle, applying his ideas in the Dutch second division. What unfolded against Cambuur that year wasn’t merely a moment of on-pitch innovation—it was a tactical experiment that spectacularly imploded in front of a bemused crowd. As The Athletic reveals, Slot’s plan was as eccentric as it was ambitious: flick the ball up at kick-off, send it soaring into the opposition half, and have attackers sprint to meet it just as it dropped into the box. A legal, if chaotic, ploy.
“If you show this to (Spain’s World Cup winner) Andres Iniesta, he’ll think this is a completely different sport,” said former Netherlands international Rene van der Gijp on Vandaag Inside. “This has nothing to do with professional football. If you do this in a cafe team, with 12 people in the crowd, you are immediately taken off. And everybody says, ‘He is crazy’.”
But to reduce Slot’s effort to mere folly would be to overlook the essence of what made it noteworthy: intent.
Outside-the-Box Thinking with Inside-the-Box ResultsThis was no whimsical prank. Slot had mulled over the move, ran it in training (with some success), and even convinced his then-manager Art Langeler and assistant Jaap Stam – yes, that Jaap Stam – to approve it.
“To give him the benefit of the doubt, it is a reminder that Slot, even as a younger man, was a keen tactician who liked to think outside the box.”
Still, that didn’t shield him from internal laughter.
“But it was still a ridiculous idea,” said Jan Everse, another former Zwolle coach. “Arne has a lot of ideas — this, unfortunately, was one of his worst ones.”
The principle behind the tactic was simple in theory. It sidestepped the offside law since everyone started behind the ball, and with a well-timed run, an exposed goalkeeper might be punished. But execution? That’s where it all fell apart.
Execution Gone AwryOn the day, everything that could go wrong, did. Joey van den Berg’s initial tap was sound. Slot’s flick-up? Not so much. Rather than landing in the opposition box, the ball soared backward into Zwolle’s own half.
“Arne wanted to fire it high into the penalty area but instead, he kicked the ball almost straight up,” Langeler recalled, chuckling.
Vincent Schildkamp, commentating on the match, gave it the gravitas it didn’t deserve:
“We’ve started this match between Zwolle and Cambuur… And that is extraordinarily strange. That might be the tension… you rarely see this, a remarkable moment from Arne Slot.”
As the ball dropped harmlessly behind Slot and his teammates, Cambuur seized the loose possession, breaking forward to launch an attack of their own. If Slot had been aiming for tactical chaos, it succeeded—but not for the intended reasons.
“What they didn’t seem to realise was that, if you kick the ball all the way to the penalty area straight from kick-off, it should be a very easy catch for the goalkeeper,” Everse pointed out. “Also, how long would the ball be in the air? Maybe three seconds? Just think how fast the players would have to be to catch up.”
Madness with a Hint of MethodAnd yet, as bonkers as the execution was, the thought behind it wasn’t devoid of logic. This wasn’t merely about confusion; it was about marginal gains, finding chaos where structure had always reigned.
“Sometimes the opponents might have the sun in their eyes and couldn’t control it,” said Ben Hendriks, former Zwolle manager and scout. “Other times it was his way of saying, ‘Here you go, we’d like to have the second ball.’ People here used to laugh about it. He would flick the ball up and then (laughing) … zuuuuut! (gestures like a rocket taking off). He would shoot it up to heaven.”
Even Langeler, one of the few to green-light the plan, held a measure of understanding:
“By firing the ball as high as possible into the penalty area, the idea was our three strikers would run forward and be there (for when it dropped) on the edge of the area. And who knows what would come of that?”
Well, what came of it was infamy—and perhaps, humility.
Slot, never one to back down easily, tried the trick again. Same opponent, same result. Cambuur must have thought they were stuck in a surrealist loop. “He made himself look ridiculous — it was unbelievable,” said Everse.
And yet, he added with admiration:
“Arne had talked about it with the other players and coaches during the week. ‘We have to change the kick-off. If we do it this way, they will be surprised’. But the kick was not what he wanted. He got it totally wrong.”
It’s difficult not to see in this young, overly enthusiastic Slot the seeds of today’s more refined manager—a man who still values creativity, but tempers it with calculation.
Humility in the Making of a ManagerSlot’s managerial tenure at Liverpool has, thus far, been one marked by balance and control. Tactical structure has replaced chaos. But those who look only at his current composure may miss what built it.
Everse, whose laughter is filled more with affection than ridicule, reflects on the arc with poignancy:
“Johan Cruyff, the best footballer and coach, always said, ‘Football is a very easy game — but it’s very difficult to play it easy’. Sometimes, though, there are players or coaches who try to invent football again. And this, from Arne, is one example.”
Therein lies the lesson. Even tactical misfires have their place. They inform, they scar, and most of all—they humble. A decade ago, Slot was flicking balls backwards from kick-off. Today, he’s on the cusp of winning the Premier League.
Not a bad arc for a “brilliant failure”.
Our View – Anfield Index AnalysisIt’s hard not to grin reading this story – our gaffer, the same Arne Slot currently steering Liverpool towards a potential Premier League crown, once tried something so ludicrous it still plays on Dutch TV a decade later. Honestly, it’s refreshing.
We’ve seen so many “safe” managers in recent years. Cautious, methodical, almost afraid of the leftfield. But Slot? He’s always had that bit of edge. Sure, this idea was a total flop – but what stands out is his willingness to try. To innovate. To do what others wouldn’t dare.
Let’s not forget, many great tactical shifts looked ridiculous until they worked. Cruyff’s keeper playing out, Guardiola’s inverted full-backs, even Klopp’s heavy metal pressing. They all started somewhere.
Slot’s failed kick-off ploy might look like slapstick now, but that footballing brain – restless, creative, obsessive – is the same one plotting Liverpool’s resurgence. We’re seeing the polished version now, but this story? It shows he was never afraid to look foolish on the journey to becoming brilliant.
From misfiring punts to Merseyside power plays. That’s a manager we can get behind.
Newcastle United’s post-EFL Cup trajectory is looking increasingly ambitious—and calculated. With the weight of a 70-year trophy drought finally lifted, Eddie Howe’s men are now pivoting towards squad evolution. According to a revealing report by TEAMtalk, one name on their radar is Harvey Elliott, Liverpool’s highly regarded 21-year-old playmaker.
This isn’t a scattergun approach. Newcastle’s recruitment is deeply rooted in realism, shaped by the boundaries of Profit and Sustainability Regulations (PSR). The Magpies want value for money, not vanity buys. TEAMtalk confirms that “targets who can be landed for what the club deem a fair price will be sought and it’s our understanding Liverpool’s Harvey Elliott is a wanted man.”
Liverpool’s stance on Elliott is pragmatic. With Arne Slot now shaping the post-Klopp era, the Reds are exploring the idea of offloading assets to finance a substantial summer rebuild. TEAMtalk adds, “Liverpool are not against holding on to Elliott but are willing to cash in in order to bolster what is already a significant transfer kitty ahead of a gigantic summer window at Anfield.”
While there’s been “chatter of a £40m asking price,” Liverpool aren’t playing that game. Instead, they’ll “see what offers arrive without giving guidance as to how much they’ll accept.” It’s a shrewd strategy that could ignite a bidding war—particularly if Newcastle believe Elliott fits the DNA of their evolving side.
Elliott’s Crossroads MomentElliott’s minutes have been slashed under Slot, a telling shift for a player once heralded as a long-term Liverpool starter. TEAMtalk sources claim “the attacker would like to stay at Liverpool, but he may have to accept he will need to find a new club if determined to be a regular starter.”
Despite his boyhood ties to the Reds, this could be the right time for Elliott to assess his next move. Newcastle appears to be a club on the rise, and Howe admires him deeply. “It’s believed Elliott possesses the attitude and attributes the Newcastle manager wants in his squad,” TEAMtalk reveals.
Isak and Elliott in Transfer Tug-of-WarCuriously, there’s also a subplot involving Alexander Isak. Liverpool, alongside Arsenal, are reportedly eyeing the Swedish striker. TEAMtalk writes, “the Reds are seriously considering a summer approach despite the fact a move would obliterate their all-time transfer record.”
With a £130m–£150m valuation placed on Isak, it’s speculated Elliott could be used in negotiations to sweeten the deal. Yet Newcastle remain resistant: “the club would much rather retain Isak and add the likes of Elliott to enhance their longer-term aims.”
They believe Elliott can help them realise a realistic five-year vision to “challenge and potentially even win the Premier League title.”
Our View – Anfield Index Index
There’s something unsettling about the thought of losing Harvey Elliott—particularly to a club like Newcastle who are fast becoming rivals rather than plucky challengers. Elliott is one of our own, a lad who bleeds Liverpool red, and letting him go now feels premature.
Still, you can’t ignore the logic. Slot clearly prefers others in midfield and out wide. The boy needs minutes, and we can’t offer them all the time. If £40m—or more—helps us finance a move for Isak or another elite forward, it might just be smart business. That said, swapping Elliott to help Newcastle grow stronger while weakening our emotional connection to the squad? That’s a hard sell.
Isak would be a blockbuster addition, but we’ve seen what happens when clubs chase the shiny prize without considering balance. Let’s just hope there’s a bigger plan here—because Elliott still has the potential to become a Premier League star. Losing him could come back to haunt us.